7 Proven Steps for CVE-2025-48384 Git Mitigation

TL;DR (for dev & SRE leads)

CVE-2025-48384 exposes CI/CD and developer laptops to submodule-driven arbitrary file write → code execution. Treat this as a pipeline risk first, repo risk second. This battle-tested CVE-2025-48384 Git mitigation playbook gives you 7 steps you can drop into GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, and Jenkins today—no external tooling required.

You’ll do this now:

  • Stop git clone --recursive from untrusted repos
  • Enforce core.hooksPath to disable repo-provided hooks in CI
  • Pin to patched Git versions at runtime
  • Audit .gitmodules defensively
  • Alert on unexpected submodule entries in PRs
  • Model submodules in your SBOM/checklist
  • Isolate build agents and gate reviews for submodule changes
7 Proven Steps for CVE-2025-48384 Git Mitigation

Quick internal reads for your team:


The threat in plain English

CVE-2025-48384 abuses how Git parses configuration for submodules. A crafted .gitmodules can redirect checkout paths and plant or trigger hooks, culminating in arbitrary file write and RCE on Linux/macOS during clone or common subcommands. Because CI runners often perform recursive clones and run hooks, a poisoned submodule can sneak execution into your build—not just your repo.

Why CI/CD is the blast radius:

  • CI runners are powerful (tokens, signing keys, artifact access)
  • Runners often auto clone submodules
  • Hooks can fire during routine steps (e.g., commit, merge, checkout)
  • Build images may have unpatched Git

Free Website Vulnerability Scanner Webpage Screenshot

Screenshot of the free tools webpage where you can access security assessment tools for different vulnerability detection.
Screenshot of the free tools webpage where you can access security assessment tools for different vulnerability detection.

7 Proven Steps (drop-in ready)

1) Disable recursive submodule clones from untrusted sources

Recursive clones are the common exploit path. Block them in CI and require a manual audit of .gitmodules first.

GitHub Actions guard (blocks --recursive in workflows):

name: guard-git-recursive
on: [workflow_call, pull_request]
jobs:
  block-recursive:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - name: Detect forbidden recursive clone
        run: |
          set -euo pipefail
          if grep -R -- '--recursive' -n .github/workflows || \
             ( [ -n "${GIT_TRACE:-}" ] && echo "$GIT_TRACE" | grep -- '--recursive' ); then
            echo "Do not use 'git clone --recursive' from untrusted sources. Audit .gitmodules first."
            exit 1
          fi

GitLab CI:

guard-git-recursive:
  stage: test
  script:
    - set -euo pipefail
    - if grep -R -- '--recursive' -n .gitlab-ci.yml; then
        echo "Forbidden: recursive clones from untrusted sources";
        exit 1;
      fi

Jenkins (Declarative):

stage('Guard Recursive') {
  steps {
    sh '''
      set -euo pipefail
      if grep -R -- "--recursive" -n Jenkinsfile; then
        echo "Forbidden: recursive clones from untrusted sources"
        exit 1
      fi
    '''
  }
}

2) Enforce core.hooksPath to neutralize repo-provided hooks in CI

Point hooks to an empty dir so no repository hooks can run during builds.

mkdir -p "$HOME/.git-hooks-empty"
git config --global core.hooksPath "$HOME/.git-hooks-empty"
git config --global --get core.hooksPath  # verify

Add as an early CI step (before any checkout-driven build steps). Keep normal hooks only on dev laptops—not in CI.


3) Pin patched Git versions (fail closed)

Verify the runner’s Git at runtime; fail if it isn’t one of the patched lines or a newer fixed version.

GitHub Actions:

- name: Enforce patched Git (CVE-2025-48384)
  run: |
    set -euo pipefail
    reqs="2.43.7 2.44.4 2.45.4 2.46.4 2.47.3 2.48.2 2.49.1 2.50.1"
    v=$(git --version | awk '{print $3}')
    ok=0
    for r in $reqs; do [ "$v" = "$r" ] && ok=1; done
    # allow anything > 2.50.1
    [ "$(printf '%s\n2.50.1\n' "$v" | sort -V | tail -1)" = "$v" ] && ok=1
    if [ $ok -ne 1 ]; then
      echo "Git $v is not patched for CVE-2025-48384 Git mitigation."; exit 1
    fi

GitLab CI (before_script):

before_script:
  - |
    set -euo pipefail
    reqs="2.43.7 2.44.4 2.45.4 2.46.4 2.47.3 2.48.2 2.49.1 2.50.1"
    v=$(git --version | awk '{print $3}')
    ok=0
    for r in $reqs; do [ "$v" = "$r" ] && ok=1; done
    [ "$(printf '%s\n2.50.1\n' "$v" | sort -V | tail -1)" = "$v" ] && ok=1
    [ $ok -eq 1 ] || { echo "Unpatched Git $v"; exit 1; }

4) Lock Git protocols at runtime

Forbid local/unsafe transports during clone to reduce attack surface:

git -c protocol.file.allow=never -c protocol.git.allow=never clone "$REPO_URL" repo

Allow only https/ssh in CI unless you explicitly whitelist otherwise.


5) Audit .gitmodules before any init

Build a tiny defensive audit and run it before submodule operations.

scripts/audit-gitmodules.sh:

set -euo pipefail
test -f .gitmodules || exit 0

# Reject control chars, absolute paths, or traversal
if grep -P '\r$' .gitmodules || grep -E 'path\\s*=\\s*/' .gitmodules || grep -E 'path\\s*=\\s*\\.\\.' .gitmodules; then
  echo "Suspicious submodule paths detected in .gitmodules"; exit 1
fi

# Restrict to https/ssh only
if grep -E 'url\\s*=\\s*(git://|file://|http://)' .gitmodules; then
  echo "Insecure or local protocols found in .gitmodules"; exit 1
fi

echo ".gitmodules audit passed"

Pre-commit (blocks bad entries from landing):

# .pre-commit-config.yaml
repos:
  - repo: local
    hooks:
      - id: audit-gitmodules
        name: Audit .gitmodules for unsafe entries
        entry: bash scripts/audit-gitmodules.sh
        language: system
        files: ^\.gitmodules$

6) Detect & alert on unexpected submodule changes

Fail PRs when .gitmodules is added/changed without approval.

GitHub Actions:

- name: Alert on .gitmodules changes
  run: |
    set -euo pipefail
    if git diff --name-only origin/${{ github.base_ref }}... | grep '^.gitmodules$'; then
      echo "::error:: .gitmodules changed. Label 'submodule-review' and require codeowners";
      exit 1
    fi

CODEOWNERS example:

# Require security/infra approval for submodule changes
/.gitmodules @security-team @devops-leads

7) Track submodules in your SBOM/checklist

Most SBOM tools won’t model submodules as packages. Emit a mini-inventory alongside your SBOM and gate on it.

Emit JSON inventory:

awk '
  $1=="[submodule" {name=$2} 
  $1=="url" {gsub(/url = /,""); print "{\\"name\\":" name ",\\"url\\":\\""$0"\\"}"} 
' .gitmodules | tr -d '[]" ' > submodules.json

Gate on unapproved hosts or new entries:

python - <<'PY'
import json, sys, re
allowed = re.compile(r'^(?:github\.com|gitlab\.com|bitbucket\.org)/your-org/')
subs = [json.loads('{'+l.strip().strip(',')+'}') for l in open('submodules.json')]
bad = [s for s in subs if not allowed.search(s['url'])]
if bad:
  print("Blocked submodules:", bad); sys.exit(1)
PY

Detection & incident response (when you think a runner got popped)

Fast checks

# 1) What hooks executed recently?
find ~/.git -maxdepth 2 -type f -name 'post-*' -exec ls -l {} +

# 2) Suspicious files dropped during clone/build
sudo find / -mmin -30 -type f -user $(whoami) 2>/dev/null | head -200

# 3) New submodules or path anomalies in last commit range
git diff --name-only --diff-filter=A -U0 HEAD~5..HEAD | grep '^.gitmodules$' || true

Containment

  • Rotate CI secrets/tokens
  • Invalidate signing keys or attestations tied to the suspect build
  • Reimage ephemeral runners; don’t reuse base images without patching Git
  • Block submodule changes until security review clears the repo

Forensics

  • Preserve build logs/artifacts
  • Snapshot runner filesystem or container (read-only) for analysis
  • Tie commit/PR to identity; check for prior suspicious forks or submodule churn

Sample report from the free tool to check Website Vulnerability

An example of a vulnerability assessment report generated with our free tool provides insights into possible vulnerabilities.
An example of a vulnerability assessment report generated with our free tool provides insights into possible vulnerabilities.

Recovery & policy hardening

  • Review gating: Require CODEOWNERS for .gitmodules.
  • Runner isolation: Separate public fork builds from internal builds; no shared workspaces.
  • Artifact trust: Use provenance/attestations; fail on missing SLSA-style attestations.
  • Least privilege: Scope CI tokens to repo and environment; short TTL.
  • Recurring checks: Add the audit + version checks to nightly jobs.
  • Programmatic assurance: Include this CVE-2025-48384 Git mitigation checklist in your SDLC gates.

Need a structured, audit-ready approach? Start with a Risk Assessment and a fix plan through Remediation Services. For quick staging checks during triage, run our Free Website Security Scanner: free.pentesttesting.com.


“Good citizen” engineering snippets (copy/paste)

Safe clone wrapper (CI):

safe_clone() {
  url="$1"; dest="$2"
  git -c protocol.file.allow=never -c protocol.git.allow=never clone "$url" "$dest"
  (cd "$dest" && test -f .gitmodules && bash scripts/audit-gitmodules.sh || true)
  (cd "$dest" && git config --local core.hooksPath "$HOME/.git-hooks-empty")
}

Minimal submodule initializer (non-recursive):

git submodule init
git config -f .gitmodules --get-regexp 'submodule\\..+\\.url' | awk '{print $1}' \
 | while read key; do
     url=$(git config -f .gitmodules --get "$key")
     case "$url" in
       https://*|ssh://*) : ;;
       *) echo "Blocked submodule protocol: $url"; exit 1;;
     esac
   done
git submodule update --init --depth=1

Where this fits in your program

  • SDLC gates: Add the CI guards to your “build” and “pre-merge” gates.
  • Assurance evidence: Keep the passing logs of your Git version check, hooksPath enforcement, and .gitmodules audit with each release.
  • Executive reporting: Track % of runners on patched Git; MTTR from detection to rotation.

Related posts on Cyber Rely (good internal linking)


CTA for dev leads: Paste the guards today, then share this checklist with your platform team. For quick web surface checks linked from your repos, use our free scanner.


Free Consultation

If you have any questions or need expert assistance, feel free to schedule a Free consultation with one of our security engineers>>

🔐 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Find answers to commonly asked questions about CVE-2025-48384 Git Mitigation.

Get a Quote

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *